Dermatologic Therapy

Introduction. Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease characterized by recurrent painful or suppurative lesions due to follicular occlusion. Biologics and other treatment modalities such as surgical excision are commonly used in the treatment of severe HS. However, despite the frequent use of biologics and surgical interventions in the treatment of patients with HS, an assessment of their combined effects is lacking. This systematic review aims to qualitatively analyze the efficacy of combined biologic and surgical treatment for HS. Methods. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. The databases PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, Cochrane (CENTRAL), ClinicalTrials.gov, MedRxiv.org, and the International Clinical Trial Registry were searched from inception until May 1, 2023. Results. A total of 1,145 studies were screened, with eight studies included for data extraction. Patients receiving combined biologic and surgical treatment showed greater improvement in the severity measurements of HS, including HS Impact Assessment, HS Physician Global Assessment, HS Sartorius Score, International Hidradenitis Suppurative Severity Score, HS recurrence rate, and Dermatology Life Quality Index. However, three studies reported a prolongation of wound healing with combined biologic and surgical treatment. Conclusion. Our systematic review highlights the additive effects of using biologics and surgery together to treat HS compared to either treatment alone. However, when both treatment modalities are used simultaneously, the potential risk of prolonged wound healing must be considered. Due to the limited number and heterogeneity of the included studies, more clinical trials are needed to establish diagnostic conclusions.

Acne keloidalis nuchae (AKN) is a condition that involves chronic inflammation of the hair follicles on the occipital scalp and posterior neck that often progresses to keloid-like plaques. AKN has most commonly been reported to affect postpubertal males of African descent. The cause of AKN has not been definitively described; however, it is likely an inflammatory response to trauma or infection of the scalp. AKN is associated with chronic scalp folliculitis, hidradenitis suppurativa, folliculitis decalvans, acne mechanica, keratosis follicularis spinulosa decalvans, cutis verticis gyrata, metabolic syndrome, acanthosis nigricans, and hypothyroidism. Treatment for AKN begins with topicals, antibiotics, and intralesional steroid injections. Refractory cases are treated with laser and surgery. Isotretinoin, cryotherapy, phototherapy, electrosection, and radiotherapy have also been effective in treating AKN but are less commonly used. In this review, we describe the existing understanding of AKN with a focus on comorbid conditions and available treatment options.

Background. In patients with stage III melanoma carrying BRAF mutations, the risk of melanoma recurrence is relatively high even after complete resection of the primary melanoma and regional lymph nodes. Methods. We collected data from patients with stage III cutaneous and acral melanoma who received adjuvant trametinib combined with dabrafenib from three cancer centres in China between August 2019 and December 2022. Results. A total of 55 patients were included in this study. The one-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate was 79.8% (95% CI 73.6–86.0%). The one-year RFS rate was 79.8% (95% CI 72.8–86.8%) in the cutaneous melanoma subgroup, while the one-year RFS rate was 74.1% (95% CI 58.0–90.2%) in the acral melanoma subgroup. Six (46.2%) patients experienced recurrence during adjuvant therapy; 7 (53.9%) patients recurred after completion of the regimen. At the time of the first recurrence, distant metastasis occurred in 10 patients, local recurrence occurred in 2 patients, and one patient experienced both distant metastasis and local recurrence. Conclusions. This study confirmed the good tolerability and short-term benefits of adjuvant therapy with dabrafenib and trametinib in Chinese patients with stage III melanoma with BRAF V600 mutation.

Background. Despite the availability of numerous therapies, keloid treatment remains a challenging clinical issue. Intralesional triamcinolone has been established as an effective corticosteroid treatment for keloids, while sporadic reports suggest the efficacy of intralesional verapamil. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of bevacizumab as an adjuvant therapy for keloid treatment. Methods. This randomized controlled trial involved 38 patients diagnosed with keloid according to clinical criteria. The study compared the effects of intralesional triamcinolone combined with bevacizumab injections with intralesional triamcinolone alone. Patients were randomly assigned to either the combination treatment group, which received intralesional triamHEXAL® (20 mg/ml, every two weeks for three months) plus Avastin® (2.5 mg/ml, every two weeks for two months), or the single treatment group, which received intralesional triamHEXAL® alone. The Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) was used for serial photographic records of scar evaluation, with differences in VSS scores considered the primary outcome, and changes in height and patient satisfaction visual analog score (VAS) were secondary outcomes. Results. A total of 38 patients participated, with a mean age (SD) of 35.32 (14.02) years and 50% male. No significant differences in age, BMI, disease duration, gender, causing, family history, or site were observed between the two groups. The single treatment group exhibited a mean reduction of 0.60 (95% CI: (−1.18, −0.01); ) in pigmentation score and a mean decrease of 1.37 (95% CI: (−2.68, −0.07); ) in total score compared to the combination treatment group after three months of treatment. There was a significant reduction in keloid height in the combination group after the end of the treatment (). No significant differences in side effects were observed between the two groups. Conclusion. Our study demonstrates that bevacizumab can be considered an effective and safe adjuvant therapy option for keloid treatment, suggesting its potential as a promising treatment for the management of keloids. This trial is registered with IRCT20131119015455N5.

Background. Breaking the itch-scratch cycle and facilitating lesion healing are pivotal in managing prurigo nodularis (PN). This study seeks to assess the efficacy of baricitinib, an oral JAK1/2 inhibitor, for treating PN. Methods. In this prospective pilot study, 12 patients with moderate to severe PN were administered oral baricitinib at a dosage of 4 mg/day for 12 weeks. The primary objective was to assess the efficacy of baricitinib in PN patients using the numeric rating scale (NRS) for pruritus, NRS sleep score, a 5-point investigator’s global assessment (IGA) scale, dermatology life quality index (DLQI), and nodular lesion count at weeks 0, 1, 2, 4, 8 and 12. In addition, the NRS pruritus and sleep scores were assessed via phone on days 2 and 4 after baricitinib treatment. Results. Baricitinib treatment led to a statistically significant improvement in the mean NRS pruritus and sleep scores, evident as early as day 2 (57.7% change from baseline; , and 34.7% change from baseline, , respectively) and consistently declining thereafter. Evaluation of nodular lesions revealed a significant reduction starting from week 2 (mean difference of 37.08 from baseline; ). Analysis of other endpoints, including mean DLQI and IGA scores, also demonstrated substantial improvement at all time points (week 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12) compared to baseline. However, it is important to acknowledge the limitation of a small sample size. This constraint warrants consideration when interpreting the results and generalizing the findings. Conclusion. This preliminary study underscores baricitinib’s potential for PN treatment by providing a rapid clinical response. The larger and longer randomized controlled trials are essential to determine the effectiveness, longevity, and safety of baricitinib in managing PN. This trial is registered with TCTR20230227002.

The vehicles used for topical dermatological treatments can significantly contribute to treatment effects while also delivering ingredients to maintain skin barrier function and reduce irritation. Tazarotene 0.045% lotion was developed using proprietary polymeric emulsion technology to provide uniform and efficient delivery of the active ingredient as well as improved safety and tolerability compared to higher-dose tazarotene formulations. The lotion vehicle additionally provides rapid and sustained improvements in moisturization and skin barrier function with patient-friendly application and cosmetic properties. Compared with trifarotene 0.005% cream, tazarotene 0.045% lotion demonstrated ∼30% greater spreadability and a lower potential for irritation. In clinical trials and investigator-initiated studies, tazarotene 0.045% lotion demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of facial and truncal acne and improved skin oiliness. Facial acne improvements were similar among study participants grouped by sex, race, ethnicity, or age. In a head-to-head study, efficacy was comparable to tazarotene 0.1% cream with approximately half the rate of treatment-emergent adverse events. Tazarotene 0.045% lotion is a beneficial acne treatment option for patients of varying ages, races, ethnicities, and skin types, delivered in a formulation that can be easily used on the face, back, and chest.